A controversial bill will be discussed in a Montana Legislative committee this afternoon in Helena. It is called House Bill No. 216, which seeks to allow big game hunting by non-tribal members within reservation boundaries on private land. Council, legal and the Executive Teams have been preparing strong testimony opposing the bill. As CSKT employees, you may be asked about the bill from family and friends or even people you come across while doing your daily work duties. As a rule, it’s a risk to have political discussions, but in case that occurs, here is some general background information that can be shared.
While HB 216 may seem like a simple idea to open hunting on fee lands within Indian reservations to state-licensed hunters, it could lead to serious challenges for everyone involved. Here’s what you need to know:
A History of Partnership at Risk
· For 35 years, CSKT and Montana have worked together on a successful agreement that balances public access and tribal sovereignty. This agreement allows bird hunting, fishing, and recreation on our lands while ensuring the health of our fish and wildlife resources.
· HB 216 threatens this partnership, putting at risk public access to these areas.
Legal Challenges Ahead
· HB 216 could trigger years of expensive and time-consuming litigation. Similar issues were addressed decades ago, and history shows that litigation over these matters is complex, uncertain, and costly.
Impact on Everyone, Not Just a Few
· The bill benefits a small group of fee landowners on the Flathead Reservation, but the broader public — including those who enjoy bird hunting, fishing, and recreation—would face restricted access to tribal lands and resources.
Our Position:
CSKT strongly opposes HB 216. It jeopardizes our sovereignty, our partnerships, and the resources. We encourage everyone to stay informed on these issues that impact our lands and people. If you have questions please contact our Communications Director, Robert McDonald at robert.mcdonald@cskt.org